What about it? Are there “secular” reasons?

Stanley Fish comments on law professor Steven Smith’s book, The Disenchantment of Secular Discourse, in which Smith argues that there are no purely “secular” reasons for policy decisions.

It is not, Smith tells us, that secular reason can’t do the job (of identifying ultimate meanings and values) we need religion to do; it’s worse; secular reason can’t do its own self-assigned job — of describing the world in ways that allow us to move forward in our projects — without importing, but not acknowledging, the very perspectives it pushes away in disdain.

This “smuggling” of the religious was pointed out at a deep level in Stephen Mulhall’s Philosophical Myths of the Fall, which persuasively shows the repetitions of the theological idea of the fall of humankind in the supposedly secular thought of Heidegger, Nietzsche, and Wittgenstein.

Read a review of Mulhall’s book here.
Read the rest of Fish’s article here.


No Comments

OMG!

No Comments

Philosopher at work…

No Comments

No silver bullet…we already know what we need to know.

No Comments

Searching for the will to blog….

No Comments

Single-Payer Health Care Plan Dies

No Comments

Happy (Re-)Birthday, Beethoven

No Comments

100 Dead in Explosion…How About a Nice T-Bone?

No Comments

Happy Thanksgiving

No Comments

Plan B 3.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization

No Comments